Downgrading Hypocrisy

Updated May 13, 2007

By Paul Weiser

In his much-maligned book "The Enemy at Home," Dinesh D'Souza makes, in passing, the exceedingly important point that hypocrisy doesn't signify. In longer form, the rightness of a moral principle is unaffected by whether its proclaimer lives up to it. Though this truth is easily demonstrated, its consequences are far-reaching... even devastating.

Take, for example, Preacher Paul who says no one should lie, steal, kill or fornicate. It turns out that Paul is a philanderer, deacons Peter and Thomas steal from the collection plate, and Pete also killed a traveler and hid the body. All lied about it (the other deacon, James, led a blameless life though many thought him a prig). Does this story invalidate Paul's teaching (and James' life)? Is the congregation free to rob, murder, sleep around and perjure themselves?

Obviously not: the deacons' transgressions are evil regardless of trust bestowed on them, and their insincere acceptance of Paul's teachings. Furthermore, Paul's preaching against fornication, though insincere, does not make fornication good or even acceptable.

Truth is truth just as the good is the good. Sincerity is not accuracy: a sincere proclaimer of Ptolemaic cosmology does not make the sun go around the earth, nor does insincere proclamation of Copernican cosmology. If murder is bad, it's bad... even if the woman who says so is herself a poisoner.

The point is that hypocrisy is a valid criticism of individuals, not the principles they avow and violate. Those who claim (or believe) otherwise are not only mistaken. In most cases, they start with attacking the principal (which, in one way or another, bites them), seek a hypocritical proclaimer of that principal, and then proclaim that his (irrelevant) hypocrisy invalidates the principal they hate. Remember: hypocrisy bites the hypocrite... no one and nothing else.


None of Your Lib (NOLIB) is a weekly column, appearing each Monday. Email responses and requests to Paul Weiser - be sure to specify in the body of the message that your mail is to NOLIB. Some past articles are in the NOLIB archives, and you are also invited to visit my home page. All responses are appreciated, and may be incorporated into succeeding columns in whole or in part unless the sender requests otherwise. And of course, the opinions expressed are those of the columnist and may not reflect the views or opinions of gte.net.